Why Modern Nations Are Collapsing from Within

Introduction

In global politics, the State plays a profoundly important role—and here, State means Raj (political power). Human civilization began with the Imperial State, that is, monarchic rule. These states existed in multiple forms: imperialistic power based on dynasties, and religiously based states such as the Islamic Caliphate.

Undoubtedly, political power existed before religion; religion emerged later. In some places, religion and power became allies, while in others religious authority remained independent. In Athens, Greece, and Sparta, religious authority was more powerful. In a country like India, Brahminical religious authority became especially dominant.

Religious Authority and Its Internal Opposition

In India, figures like Vishwamitra and Buddha stood in opposition to religious authority. Mahavira, on the other hand, was more an elite religious founder. Religious power was so strong that even Rama, despite being an incarnation, had to atone for Brahma-hatya (the killing of a Brahmin) after killing a demon, a cannibal, and a rapist. Religious texts even describe Ravana as a great figure.

Contemporary Religious Revival and Power Shift

Today, as a religious resurgence takes place against Islam, power is shifting into the hands of figures like Premanand, Bageshwar, Kumar Vishwas, and the RSS. Somewhere Rama is being turned into an Imam, somewhere Radha is being chanted, somewhere Akbar is portrayed as a great devotee, and elsewhere stories glorifying Ravana are being sold as business. In essence, Hindu religious power continues in its caste-based form, as it historically has.

European Roots of Modern Political Thought

If we describe the nature of present-day politics, it is deeply influenced by Europe. In Europe, conflicts began between the Imperial State—pure bloodline, hereditary monarchy—and the Religious State. The Pope’s power clashed with kings; conflicts between the Papacy, Glastonbury, the English Crown, Henry VIII, and the Pope eventually led to the Bible being translated into English.

The Rise of the Middle Class and the New World Order

Similarly, when middle feudal lords sought freedom from bloodline-based aristocracy, America’s New World Order emerged. Due to fragmented journalism and cheap translations in India, middle class was translated as madhyam-varg. But the European middle class stood below the king yet above the masses—it was not servant class, but an elite.

That middle-class communism intellectually engineered the New World Order in America, from which democracy emerged. Though democracy lacked bloodline monarchy, everything else remained the same: the Nation-State existed, nationalism existed—only the king was removed.

Read this also: https://inkindianews.com/venezuela-regime-change-operation-global-political-blueprint/

The Contradictions of Nationalism

This too has a contradiction. Can an Indian nationalist be a friend of an American nationalist? The question itself is invalid. American nationalism supports American dominance; Indian nationalism supports Indian dominance. It is merely flag-worship—just without kings and queens. This was the middle-class revolution, that is, communism.

From Anarchism to Marxism

Later, Europe’s middle class began to think again. Christianity still dominated America; people still went to church. England allowed elections, yet people still sang Long Live the King/Queen. Then another anarchist ideology arose—Marxism, emerging after industrialization.

Workers—earning money outside traditional agriculture due to the industrial revolution, and learning to read to earn—were given the idea of ruling themselves, removing owners, and directly taking profits. From here came Marxist states, dividing the world into a binary: with us or against us.

National Socialism and Fascist Synthesis

Meanwhile, a cocktail of nationalism and socialism emerged—the National Socialist line, the Nazi line under Hitler. He was nationalist yet socialist. Initially, Russian Marxism supported this because it was not imperialistic; it had an elected leader and opposed European feudal powers.

The Enduring Power of the Religious State

Amid all this, one must not forget the Religious State. No other religion has such a state today—but Islam does, and it is powerful. The British dismantled the Turkish Caliphate, and America allied with the Islamic State for control over the Suez Canal, strengthening Islamic power.

Around 1924, at Egypt’s Al-Azhar University, the Qur’an was canonized—unified into one version. Hadith, Sharia, and Fiqh were systematized to empower Saudi Arabia’s Arabs and weaken Turkey. But this strategy later backfired when Islam abandoned the Nation-State and allied with other forms of state power.

World War, Anti-Semitism, and Islamic Expansion

With the advent of World War II, Hitler, and earlier anti-Semitism in Europe—especially Russia—attention shifted elsewhere. During this period, the Islamic State grew even stronger. Today, it is a major force. Through capitalism and its religious structure, Islam expanded rapidly.

The Three States of the Modern World

Today, only three types of states remain:

The Nation-State – a replica of monarchy, except the public chooses the ruler.
The Communist/Marxist/Anarchist State.
The Religious State – now existing only in Islamic form.

Here, the problem becomes more complex. Nation-states cannot be friends with each other, nor can one nation-state exist inside another. But Islamic and Communist states can form alliances, can exist within nation-states, and even become allies there.

Mutual Hostility, Tactical Alliance

Islamic states view communist states as enemies of the majority religion; they believe that once religion is destroyed, everyone will be converted to Islam and then communists will be killed. Communist states believe that once everyone becomes anarchist and atheist, Islam will automatically vanish.

Because both operate within nation-states, the nation-state becomes weaker—it must protect both itself and its culture.

Cultural Annihilation Before Political Victory

In effect, communism and the Islamic state first seek cultural genocide of any nation-state. Their final goals differ, but the initial target is the same. Islam has no problem with capitalism—as long as one accepts Islamic irrationality. Communism, through NGO-ism, demands everything for free.

To spread Islam, money is used—oil money and Suez Canal money exist. This is why communist NGOs also run on Islamic funding. Yet atheism, that is communism, should theoretically oppose Islam as well.

Conclusion: A War of States

This state war continues within every country and across the world. Wherever democracy exists, Islamic unrest and the Left come together. Islam determines the path of chaos; the Left opposes capital while feeding on NGO free money.

They have their own states, yet they exist within every nation-state. This is the core of today’s global crisis: State versus State.

External Links: https://www.reddit.com/r/whiteoutsurvival/comments/1lbmy53/state_vs_state_battle_does_anybody_know_anything/

Harishankar Shahi

This article is written by Harishankar Shahi, a journalist with in-depth knowledge of finance, politics, and science. He is known for presenting complex topics in a clear, factual, and reader-friendly manner. His writing focuses on analysis, context, and real-world impact, helping readers better understand issues that shape the economy, governance, and society. His Facebook profile link:

https://www.facebook.com/harishankar.shahi